Skip to content
Home » Budget Friendly Tenda BE3600 ME3 Pro vs Deco vs Cudy

Budget Friendly Tenda BE3600 ME3 Pro vs Deco vs Cudy

  • by

Tenda Be3600 ME3 Pro is budget friendly mesh wifi7 in entry level category. How this Tenda be3600 perform compared to Deco be3600 and Cudy M3600?

In this article:

What this product does

Tenda ME3 Pro (or Tenda EE3 Pro in global name) is one of affordable BE3600 mesh wifi 7 products in low end category, it’s a dual-band Wi-Fi 7 mesh system designed to provide high-speed, whole-home coverage with advanced features like Multi-Link Operation (MLO) and NFC for easy connections. Similar to this product is Deco BE23, or Asus DB4, or new Cudy M3600.

One step higher level of this product is Tenda ME6 Pro, which is dual band BE5100 wifi7 system delivering bandwidth up to 5000 Mbps (4323Mbps @5GHz + 688Mbps @2.4GHz). This should be comparable to Deco BE25, or Asus DB5.

Tenda Vs Deco Vs Cudy

Both Tenda models and those comparable deco and Cudy products are categorized into low end products with affordable prices. These low-cost products pose a real threat to major vendors like Netgear and Asus, which price their products higher. The market share for low-end Wi-Fi routers is significantly larger than that of mid-range and high-end products. This makes competition in this low-end product category very tight.

Tenda BE3600

Knowing that the entry level of wifi7 products is powerful for home, even for large homes, the demand is quite high. With this low end products you can work and play, including video streaming, video call with your webcams such as eMeet and Nexigo 4k webcams.

Now let’s focus on Tenda ME2 Pro and compare it with Deco and Cudy.

Tenda BE3600 vs Deco

TP-Link Deco is a popular brand in mesh wifi routers which prices are lower than those well known Orbi and Asus products.  Deco BE23 is the entry level of Deco series in mesh wifi 7 products which the price is categorized as affordable products. Can Tenda ME3 Pro compete with this low end Deco product?

Table 1 show you spec comparison between Tenda BE3600 and Deco BE23 to help you decide which one is suitable to meet your home network.

Deco be23 be3600

All the three products are designed with the same BE3600 network segment, dual band mesh wifi 7, the lowest level of wifi 7 products.

See also Asus BE3600 vs Netgear vs Archer wifi7 routers.

Processor

One of the weakness points of Tenda  is the dual core processor embedded on ME3 Pro which is only a dual core CPU as opposed to its competitors Deco and Cudy which both are Quad core CPU.

A router with a quad-core CPU generally provides superior performance compared to one with a dual-core CPU, especially when handling complex or demanding network environments with multiple devices. The additional cores enable true parallel processing, allowing the router to manage more tasks simultaneously.

With this reality, Tenda BE3600 should theoretically provide a slower networking process than Deco and Cudy, unless Tenda has software that is much more efficient than Deco and Cudy.

See also best value Archer GE650 vs Asus BE1200 wifi7 routers that all come with Quad core processors for fast processing tasks.

Interfaces

Tenda be3600 and Cudy, come equipped with 1GE WAN port so they can support internet speed up to 1Gbps. On the other hand, deco be3600 comes equipped with 2.5GE WAN port to allow you subscribe blast internet speed up to 2.5Gbps from your provider. Even though you don’t require Internet speed up to 2Gbps, but Deco be3600 comes with 2.5GE LAN port while the other two only 1GE. Unfortunately, this 2.5GE LAN port is only one. Both Tenda and Cudy come with two 1GE LAN ports.

Comparison table Tenda vs Deco

Quad core processor for Deco be3600 is one of the advantages in opposed to Tenda. And Deco with 2x 2.5GE ports is another advantages besides the CPU.

Table 1 Tenda vs Deco

 Tenda ME3ProDeco Be23
Wifi segmentDual band be3600Dual band BE3600
Signal rates2882 Mbps @5GHz
688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz;
Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Antennas5 x 3dBi internal antennas with independent external FEMs4x high performance internal antennas
Coverage6,600 sq ft.6,500 sq ft
Ethernet Ports3x GE / node1x 2.5GE WAN
1x 2.5GE LAN
USB PortN/A6,500 Sq ft
ProcessorDual core 1GHz CPU Memory: 512MB1.1 GHz quad-core CPU Memory: 512 MB RAM; 128 MB of flash memory
Dimension  3.39″L x 7.48″W x 3.39″H5.91 x 5.91 x 2.44 in (150 x 150 x 62 mm)
Price$165.99 (3-pack)$219.99 (3-pack)

Comparison table Tenda vs Cudy

In terms of processor embedded on the board, Cudy is a quad core CPU as opposed to Tenda which is only dual core CPU. While the other specs are the same. Technically Tenda is one step behind Cudy in terms network processing tasks.

Cudy BE3600

Table 2 Tenda Vs Cudy

 Tenda ME3ProCudy M3600
Wifi segmentDual band be3600Dual band BE3600 wifi 7
Signal rates2882Mbps @5GHz
688Mbps @2.4GHz
Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz
Up to  688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Antennas5 x 3dBi internal antennas with independent external FEMsInternal antennas
Coverage6,600 sq ft.2,900 sq ft
Ethernet Ports3x GE / node1x 1GE WAN
2x 1GE LAN port
USB PortN/AN/A
ProcessorDual core 1GHz CPU Memory: 512MB2.0 Quad core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU Memory: 512MB RAM; 128 MB ROM  
Dimension3.39″L x 7.48″W x 3.39″HUnspecified
Price$165.99 (3-pack)$199,99 (3-pack)

Prices gap between the three products are not so large, almost the same. So, with those two spec comparison tables, you can make up your mind which one is suitable to meet your business network. Deco is slightly pricy but supports higher speed of both Internet and LAN connection. Click the product’s link below to read more details and see the current prices.

Related products

How popular eero 7 series products perform when compared to Orbi 7 products? Click here three categories of eero 7 series vs Orbi, comparison eero and orbi in low end, middle range, and high end products.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version