Author Archive by admin

Budget Friendly Tenda BE3600 ME3 Pro vs Deco vs Cudy

By admin In tenda be3600, tenda be3600 vs cudy, tenda be3600 vs deco

Tenda Be3600 ME3 Pro is budget friendly mesh wifi7 in entry level category. How this Tenda be3600 perform compared to Deco be3600 and Cudy M3600?

In this article:

What this product does
Tenda BE3600 vs Deco
Tenda BE3600 Vs Cudy

What this product does

Tenda ME3 Pro (or Tenda EE3 Pro in global name) is one of affordable BE3600 mesh wifi 7 products in low end category, it’s a dual-band Wi-Fi 7 mesh system designed to provide high-speed, whole-home coverage with advanced features like Multi-Link Operation (MLO) and NFC for easy connections. Similar to this product is Deco BE23, or Asus DB4, or new Cudy M3600.

One step higher level of this product is Tenda ME6 Pro, which is dual band BE5100 wifi7 system delivering bandwidth up to 5000 Mbps (4323Mbps @5GHz + 688Mbps @2.4GHz). This should be comparable to Deco BE25, or Asus DB5.

Tenda Vs Deco Vs Cudy

Both Tenda models and those comparable deco and Cudy products are categorized into low end products with affordable prices. These low-cost products pose a real threat to major vendors like Netgear and Asus, which price their products higher. The market share for low-end Wi-Fi routers is significantly larger than that of mid-range and high-end products. This makes competition in this low-end product category very tight.

Knowing that the entry level of wifi7 products is powerful for home, even for large homes, the demand is quite high. With this low end products you can work and play, including video streaming, video call with your webcams such as eMeet and Nexigo 4k webcams.

Now let’s focus on Tenda ME2 Pro and compare it with Deco and Cudy.

Tenda BE3600 vs Deco

TP-Link Deco is a popular brand in mesh wifi routers which prices are lower than those well known Orbi and Asus products. Deco BE23 is the entry level of Deco series in mesh wifi 7 products which the price is categorized as affordable products. Can Tenda ME3 Pro compete with this low end Deco product?

Table 1 show you spec comparison between Tenda BE3600 and Deco BE23 to help you decide which one is suitable to meet your home network.

All the three products are designed with the same BE3600 network segment, dual band mesh wifi 7, the lowest level of wifi 7 products.

Processor

One of the weakness points of Tenda is the dual core processor embedded on ME3 Pro which is only a dual core CPU as opposed to its competitors Deco and Cudy which both are Quad core CPU.

A router with a quad-core CPU generally provides superior performance compared to one with a dual-core CPU, especially when handling complex or demanding network environments with multiple devices. The additional cores enable true parallel processing, allowing the router to manage more tasks simultaneously.

With this reality, Tenda BE3600 should theoretically provide a slower networking process than Deco and Cudy, unless Tenda has software that is much more efficient than Deco and Cudy.

See also best value Archer GE650 vs Asus BE1200 wifi7 routers that all come with Quad core processors for fast processing tasks.

Interfaces

Tenda be3600 and Cudy, come equipped with 1GE WAN port so they can support internet speed up to 1Gbps. On the other hand, deco be3600 comes equipped with 2.5GE WAN port to allow you subscribe blast internet speed up to 2.5Gbps from your provider. Even though you don’t require Internet speed up to 2Gbps, but Deco be3600 comes with 2.5GE LAN port while the other two only 1GE. Unfortunately, this 2.5GE LAN port is only one. Both Tenda and Cudy come with two 1GE LAN ports.

Comparison table Tenda vs Deco

Quad core processor for Deco be3600 is one of the advantages in opposed to Tenda. And Deco with 2x 2.5GE ports is another advantages besides the CPU.

Table 1 Tenda vs Deco

	Tenda ME3Pro	Deco Be23
Wifi segment	Dual band be3600	Dual band BE3600
Signal rates	2882 Mbps @5GHz 688 Mbps @2.4GHz	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz; Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Antennas	5 x 3dBi internal antennas with independent external FEMs	4x high performance internal antennas
Coverage	6,600 sq ft.	6,500 sq ft
Ethernet Ports	3x GE / node	1x 2.5GE WAN 1x 2.5GE LAN
USB Port	N/A	6,500 Sq ft
Processor	Dual core 1GHz CPU Memory: 512MB	1.1 GHz quad-core CPU Memory: 512 MB RAM; 128 MB of flash memory
Dimension	3.39″L x 7.48″W x 3.39″H	5.91 x 5.91 x 2.44 in (150 x 150 x 62 mm)
Price	$165.99 (3-pack)	$219.99 (3-pack)

Comparison table Tenda vs Cudy

In terms of processor embedded on the board, Cudy is a quad core CPU as opposed to Tenda which is only dual core CPU. While the other specs are the same. Technically Tenda is one step behind Cudy in terms network processing tasks.

Table 2 Tenda Vs Cudy

	Tenda ME3Pro	Cudy M3600
Wifi segment	Dual band be3600	Dual band BE3600 wifi 7
Signal rates	2882Mbps @5GHz 688Mbps @2.4GHz	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Antennas	5 x 3dBi internal antennas with independent external FEMs	Internal antennas
Coverage	6,600 sq ft.	2,900 sq ft
Ethernet Ports	3x GE / node	1x 1GE WAN 2x 1GE LAN port
USB Port	N/A	N/A
Processor	Dual core 1GHz CPU Memory: 512MB	2.0 Quad core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU Memory: 512MB RAM; 128 MB ROM
Dimension	3.39″L x 7.48″W x 3.39″H	Unspecified
Price	$165.99 (3-pack)	$199,99 (3-pack)

Prices gap between the three products are not so large, almost the same. So, with those two spec comparison tables, you can make up your mind which one is suitable to meet your business network. Deco is slightly pricy but supports higher speed of both Internet and LAN connection. Click the product’s link below to read more details and see the current prices.

Click here to see Cudy BE3600 on Amazon (#Ads)
Or you may like to Click here to SHOP Tenda BE3600 on Amazon (#Ad)

Related products

How popular eero 7 series products perform when compared to Orbi 7 products? Click here three categories of eero 7 series vs Orbi, comparison eero and orbi in low end, middle range, and high end products.

Cudy M3600 vs Deco vs Asus Which One is Suitable for You

By admin In cudy m3600, cudy m3600 vs asus bd4, cudy m3600 vs deco be23

Cudy M3600 is one of best value entry level mesh wifi 7 products on the market. How does this product compete with popular Deco BE23 and Asus BD4?

In this article:

Why Cudy
Entry level Cudy
Cudy vs Deco BE23
Cudy vs Asus BD4

Why Cudy?

Cudy is relatively new networking company. It is one of Chinese brands in networking sector, and it was established in 2018 as Shenzhen Cudy Technology Co., Ltd. It is headquartered in the Nanshan District of Shenzhen, China. As a new company,

Cudy’s strategy to attract customer market share is by offering products at significantly lower prices up to 30-50% than equivalent models from other major brands like TP-Link or ASUS. Their products are not just cheap, but stable hardware. Most users report strong thermal management (well-ventilated cases) and reliable signals even through thick walls.

However, it’s not like TP-Link and Asus, Cudy software feel less “polished” or “flashy” but still user-friendly and easy to use.

Entry level Cudy

At the entry level wifi 7 category, you can find Cudy M3600 which is targeted to compete with popular Deco be23 and Asus BD4. However, Deco and Asus also provide discounts to match Cudy’s price when they are under pressure from competitors with lower prices.

Unfortunately, the Cudy M3600 wifi7 only supports internet speeds up to 1G. This is in contrast to its predecessor, the Cudy M3000 wifi6, which supports internet speeds up to 2.5G. However, internet speed of 1G is more than enough to support your work and play, including web browsing, media social tasks, webcam need such as budget friendly eMeet or Nexigo 4k webcams.

Check out these lower-end Cudy products comparison table below:

Table 1 Cudy entry level

Model	Cudy M3600	Cudy M3000
Wifi segment	Dual band BE3600 wifi 7	Dual band AX3000 wifi 6
Signal rates	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz	Up to 2402 Mbps @5GHz Up tp 574 Mbps @2.4GHz
Antennas	4x internal antennas	5x Internal antennas
Ethernet Ports	1x 1GE WAN 2x 1GE LAN port	1x 2.5GE WAN 1x 1GE LAN
Coverage	2,900 sq ft up to	2,900 sq ft up to 256 Devices
Processor	2.0 Quad core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU Memory: 512MB RAM; 128 MB ROM	1.3 GHz Dual-Core, ARM Cortex-A53 Flash: 128 MB (1 Gbit) NAND; 256 MB RAM
Price	$219,99 (3-pack)	$159,99 (3-pack)

So, should you require mesh wifi that supports up to 2.5Gbps internet speed with lower price, Cudy M3000 is worth buying. However this one is still wifi6 standards. See also low end wifi7 routers, check here Asus BE3600 vs Netgear vs Archer wifi7 routers.

Now, let’s compare how this Cudy M3600 with popular Deco M23 and Asus BD4 which the prices are almost the same as M3600.

Cudy M3600 vs Deco BE23

Deco BE23 is the lowest level of TP-Link mesh wifi 7 which is currently very popular for its performance and budget friendly product. It uses the streamlined Deco mobile app for setup and management, and offers TP-Link HomeShield for network security and parental controls. Its sibling is Deco BE25, one step higher rang than be23. See also Deco be25 vs Asus DB5 BE5000, both are also popular at lower end wifi7 category.

Internet support

Unlike its predecessor Cudy M3000 that supports internet speed up to 2.5Gbps, M3600 only supports up to 1G internet speed. While its rivals Deco BE23 and Asus BD4 come with 2.5G WAN Ports to allow you subscribe fast internet speed up to 2.5GE from your providers. Most today cable modem with DOCSIS 3.1 technology come with 2.5Gbps Ethernet port such as Arris S33, Motorola MB8611, or Netgear CM2000 DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem.

See also Arris G20 vs Cax30, best value all-in-one wifi 6 routers with built-in DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem.

Besides the WAN port, M3600 is less advantages compared to the other two rivals only if you require multi-gig LAN port. Both Deco and Asus come equipped with 2.5G LAN port, while Cudy only comes with 2x 1G LAN ports.

Faster processor

Cudy M3600 comes embedded with 2.0GHz quad core processor, faster clock rate than its rivels Deco BE23 and Asus BD4. The faster clock rates the faster the processor completes the processing networking tasks. Generally a processor with a higher clock rate (measured in Gigahertz, GHz) is better for a Wi-Fi router, but this benefit depends heavily on other factors.

The clock rate determines how many instructions the CPU can execute per second. A faster processor can handle complex network tasks more quickly, which is essential for managing the demands of a modern 2026 home network.

Table 2 Cudy M3600 vs Deco BE23

Model	Cudy M3600	Deco BE23
Wifi segment	Dual band BE3600 wifi 7	Dual band BE3600
Signal rates	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz; Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Ethernet Ports	1x 1GE WAN 2x 1GE LAN port	1x 2.5GE WAN 1x 2.5GE LAN
USB	N/A	N/A
Coverage	2,900 sq ft	6,500 Sq ft
Processor	2.0 Quad core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU Memory: 512MB RAM; 128 MB ROM	1.1 GHz quad-core CPU Memory: 512 MB RAM; 128 MB of flash memory
Price	$199,99 (3-pack)	$219.99 (3-pack)

Cudy M3600 vs Asus

In terms of network security, Asus BD4 (and other Asus router products) is secure in nature thanks to Asus AiProtection feature. ASUS AiProtection matters significantly for ASUS router owners, as it provides a robust, subscription-free suite of commercial-grade network security and parental control features that are typically offered as paid add-ons by other brands.

Cudy doesn’t come with network security feature like Asus does. Deco comes with TP-Link HomeShield for comprehensive network protection, robust parental controls, and real-time IoT security.

Both AiProtection and HomeShield service add crucial layers of defense and control that a standard router lacks.

Table 3 Cudy vs Asus

Model	Cudy M3600	Asus BD4
Wifi segment	Dual band BE3600 wifi 7	Dual band BE3600
Signal rates	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz	Up to 2882 Mbps @5GHz; Up to 688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Ethernet Ports	1x 1GE WAN 2x 1GE LAN port	1x 2.5GE WAN 1x 2.5GE LAN
USB	N/A	N/A
Coverage	2,900 sq ft	6,500 Sq ft
Processor	2.0 Quad core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU Memory: 512MB RAM; 128 MB ROM	1.5GHz quad-core processor Memory: RAM 512MB, Flash 128MB.
Network security	Standard	Commercial grade AiProtection
Price	$199,99 (3-pack)	$219.99 (3-pack)

The prices gap each of all the three products is not large, just slightly difference. The listed prices here are not current, click the product’s link for current price and learn more details and shop on Amazon (#ad).

Click here to SHOP Cudy M3600 on Amazon (#Ad)
Or you may prefer Deco BE23 or Asus DB4 on Amazon (#Ad)

Best Value emeet s600 vs Nexigo vs Logitech 4k Webcams

By admin In emeet s600, emeet s600 vs logitech brio, emeet s600 vs nexigo

S600 is one of best value for money Emeet 4k webcams for consumers. How does this S600 product stack up against Nexigo 970 and Logitech Brio 4K?

In this article

What this emeet S600 does
eMeet S600 vs Nexigo vs Logitech
eMeet S600 vs Nexigo N970p
eMeet S600 vs Logitech Brio

What this emeet s600 does

eMeet is one of Chinese-based tech companies that focuses on video conference solutions including webcams, speakerphones, and other video conference devices. It was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. It is well know brand for their budget-friendly products compared to popular established brands like Logitech without sacrifice the performance.

S600 Highlights

Ultra-high 4K resolution at 30 fps and 1080p at 60 fps for smoother video.
Fast autofocus and auto light correction help keep you sharp and well-lit without manual adjustments.
Dual noise-canceling microphones for clearer voice pickup.
A good-sized 73° field of view (FOV) at 4K and adjustable FOV at 1080p.
Privacy cover & plug-and-play USB simplicity.

Emeet S600 is great if you want strong image quality and smooth video calls, streaming, or content creation at a lower price. S600 is one of best value for money eMeet 4k webcams on the market which has successfully captured the consumer webcam market share. How does this product perform compared to Nexigo and Logitech 4k webcams?

eMeet S600 vs Nexigo vs Logitech

like eMeet, nexigo also introduced various models of 4k webcams for consumers including N950p, and the newer one is N970p with AI-powered auto framing and face detection. See also Obsbot webcam which also features AI-powered auto tracking.

Both eMeet and Nexigo are good for basic use or tighter budgets as opposed to Logitech. Logitech was established for years and are targeted for professionals thanks to refined image tuning and high-end hardware. One of popular Logitech 4k webcams is Logitech Brio 4k, mostly used by professional and businesses. We’ll focus on eMeet S600 model and stack up against Nexigo N970p and Logitech Brio 4k webcams.

See also Logitech Meetup vs Jabra panacast webcam for video conference, good for connecting remote offices.

eMeet S600 vs Nexigo N970p

Nexigo N970p is one of the newer models of Nexigo 4k webcams, and looks like the enhancement version of the previous N950 series, thanks to its AI-power auto frame and auto tracking features.

Table 1 show you spec comparison between emeet s600 and nexigo n970p (newer model). The price gap between them is quite large. Both models come equipped with 4k Sony image sensor, S600 offers slightly larger one for sharper image quality than Nexigo. However, with the naked eye of course you can’t see the difference.

While table 2 represents spec comparison table between eMeet S600 and Logitech Brio 4k webcams. The price gap between these two models is also quite large. Have closer look at those two spec comparison tables to help you understand the strength and weaknesses each of the product.

Lens

All the three models come equipped with fixed lens with digital zoom and autofocus. Both Nexigo and eMeet are designed with adjustable view angle, while Logitech is designed with three preset view angle you can choose. Emeet allows you to use the preset fixed view angle at 73° at 4K, the perfect frame for yourself and the background.

Nexigo with its newer model (n970p) is designed with AI-powered auto framing and face detection, an enhancement from the previous N950 model.

Resolution and frame rate

Webcam resolution is primary factor in visual clarity. 4k webcams should be technically four times as clarity as 1080p webcams. Even though 4k webcams don’t always guarantee a better experience, there are still other factors that influence the performance. While frame rate / frame per second (FPS) for webcams is critical metric, since it relates directly to how professional your video appears to others at the other end.

All the three models come equipped with 4k image sensor. Both eMeet and Nexigo comes equipped with Starvis Sony image sensor for sharp image detail and support 60fps @1080p. Logitech Brio can go up to 90fps @720p, up to 60fps @1080p same as the other two competitors.

Digital zoom

All the three models come with fixed lens, so zooming can only happened with digital zoom. Digital zoom capability in a webcam is typically used because the device has a fixed lens. Unlike cameras with a true zoom lens (optical zoom), most standard webcams do not have moving internal glass elements to physically magnify a subject.

S600 can zoom digitally up to 2.1x, while N970p can go up to 10x digital zoom, and the Logitech Brio can go digital zoom up to 5x.

Table 1 e-Meet vs Nexigo 4k webcam

	eMeet S600	Nexigo N970p
Image sensor	½.55” Sony image sensor	½.7” CMOS 8.5MP Sony Starvis Image sensor
Lens	Fixed lens with auto focus	Fixed lens with fixed focus
View angle	adjustable 40°-73° at 1080p / fixed at 73° at 4K	25-90° Adjustable View
Focus	Autofocus	Fixed focus with AI-powered auto framing and face detection
Zoom	2.1x digital zoom	Up to 10x digital zoom at 4K@30fps
Resolution	4k @30 fps; / 1080p @60 fps	8.5MP (3840 x 2160) @30 fps 1080p @60 fps
Microphone	Dual Noise-Canceling Mics	Dual noise cancellation Omni directional microphones
Flash memory	N/A, rely on your PC	Yes, to save all your webcam settings for easy recall
Privacy cover	Built-in gear-driven privacy cover	N/A
Connection type	USB 2.0 and USB 3.0	USB Type B 3.0 port
Dimension	2.95″D x 2.8″W x 2.05″H	‎7.09 x 1.67 x 1.1 inches
System requirement	all popular operating systems and software	Windows 7 (1080p or lower), Windows 8.1, Windows 10; macOS™ 10.10 or higher; Android; Linux
Remote control	N/A	Yes, requires two AAA batteries (not included)
Price	$69.99	$169.99

eMeet S600 vs Logitech Brio

Logitech Brio 4k webcam is one of high end products for professional streaming or business use. It’s a very well-rounded 4K webcam with great build quality and reliable software. This webcam is known for strong low-light performance and consistent results.

Table 2 eMeet vs Logitech Brio

	eMeet S600	Logitech Brio 4k
Image sensor	½.55” Sony image sensor	8.8MP image sensor
Lens	Fixed lens with auto focus	Glass fixed lens with auto focus
View angle	adjustable 40°-73° at 1080p / fixed at 73° at 4K	Selectable preset view angle : 90°/78°/65° diagonal FoV
Focus	Autofocus	Autofocus
Zoom	2.1x digital zoom	5x digital zoom full HD
Resolution	4k @30 fps; / 1080p @60 fps	4k (4096 x 2160) @30 fps; 1080p @60 fps ; or 720p @90 fps
Microphone	Dual Noise-Canceling Mics	Dual stereo Omni-directional microphone with noise reduction filter
Flash memory	N/A, rely on your PC	N/A
Privacy cover	Built-in gear-driven privacy cover	Attachable privacy cover
Connection type	USB 2.0 and USB 3.0	USB-A or USB-C
Dimension	2.95″D x 2.8″W x 2.05″H	4.01 in x 1.06 in x 1.06 in (102mm x 27.0 mm x 27.0 mm)
System requirement	all popular operating systems and software	Windows 7 or later; Mac OS 10.10.or later; Chrome OS
Remote control	N/A	Yes, requires two AAA batteries (not included)
Price	$69.99	$199.99

The listed prices may not be the current ones, click the product’s link below to see the current price on Amazon.

Click here to SHOP eMeet S600 on Amazon (#Ad)
Or you may like to SHOP Nexigo N970 on Amazon (#Ad)

Related products

To support your home wifi network, consider having recent wifi7 routers such as TP-Link Archer and Asus. Click here Archer ge650 vs Asus be12000 wifi 7 routers. Or you may like all-in-one device Arris G20 vs Cax30, wifi router with built-in DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem.

Hot Items TP-Link Archer ge650 vs Asus be12000

By admin In archer be670 vs asus be12000, archer ge650

TP-Link archer ax11000 is one of hot items on the market; and the newer model is Archer ge650 leveraging wifi 7 standards. How archer ge650 vs Asus Rog be12000 perform, which one is suitable to your home need?

In this article

TP-Link vs Asus gaming router
Archer GE650 vs Ax11000
Asus ROG BE12000 vs ROG AX11000
Asus Be12000 vs Archer GE650

Asus vs TP-Link Gaming routers

In term of wifi gaming router, Asus brand is one of popular vendors in producing the products with its republic of gaming (RoG) routers for consumers. Its rival is TP-Link with its best friendly gaming router. Wireless gaming router should be one step higher level than standard one. It must prioritize ultra-low latency, high throughput, and it should be able to manage intelligent traffic to handle demanding high intensive bandwidth tasks like 4K/8K streaming, competitive esports, and wireless VR.

TP-Link middle range gaming router

Prior the introductions of latest generations of wifi standards (wifi 7), there are heaps of wifi 6 products on the market to date. TP-Link Archer AX11000 is one of popular wireless gaming routers on the market with budget friendly price. Currently, with the emerging of wifi7 products on the market, TP-Link introduced Archer GE650, one of wireless gaming routers in the middle range category. What makes these two models set apart?

See also budget friendly Gl Inet Flient 3 vs Netgear vs Archer middle range routers.

Comparison Archer GE650 vs AX1100

Table 1 below shows you spec comparison table between the two products. The apparent different is the leveraging wifi generations to each of the product. Archer ge650 adopts the latest wifi7 standards, while Archer ax11000 is wifi6.

GE650 wifi 7 routers come with 6GHz clean radio bands. Currently there are many wifi 7 USB adapter models on the market. So you can upgrade your computers to get benefit of clean and fast 6GHz band connections.

Table 1 Archer GE650 vs AX11000

	Archer GE650	Archer AX11000
Wifi segment	Tri-band Be11000	Tri-band AX11000
	5764 Mbps @6GHz; 4323 Mbps @5GHz’ 574 Mbps @2.4GHz	4804 Mbps @5GHz; 4808 Mbps @5GHz; 1148Mbps @2.4GHz
Ethernet Ports	1x 5Gbps WAN port 1x 5Gbps LAN; 3x 2.5Gbps LAN	1x 2.5Gbps WAN Port 8x Gigabit LAN Ports
USB Ports	1x USB 3.0	1x USB-C 3.0 Port 1x USB-A 3.0 port
Game center	Game accelerator ; Game panel; Game statistics; Dedicated gaming band	Game accelerator ; Game Statistic; Game protector
Processor	Quad core CPU	1.8 GHz 64-bit Quad core CPU
Price	$349.99	$220

The price tagged of the new products is pricey as opposed to older one, and price gap is quite large. Investing Archer ax11000 is still worthy.

Click here for Archer ax11000 on Amazon (#Ad)

Asus ROG BE12000 vs ROG AX11000

In the mid-range WiFi 7 segment, Asus has introduced the ROG Strix GS-BE12000, a new WiFi 7 gaming router. It appears to be the successor to the earlier Asus ROG Rapture GT-AX11000, which was a popular WiFi 6 gaming router. Beyond the jump to a newer WiFi generation, what really sets these two models apart?

Both routers are clearly designed with gamers in mind. However, it may come as a surprise that the newer WiFi 7-based GS-BE12000 supports internet speeds of up to only 2.5Gbps. In contrast, the older GT-AX11000, despite being a WiFi 6 router, offers 10Gbps connectivity and is already ready for next-generation DOCSIS 4.0 cable networks.

Table 2 Asus Gaming routers

	Asus ROG Strix GS-BE12000	Asus ROG Rapture gtax11000
Wifi segment	Tri-band BE12000	Tri-band AX11000
	5764 Mbps @6GHz; 2×2 5764 Mbps @5GHz; 4×4 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	4804 Mbps @5GHz -1 4808 Mbps @5GHz -2 1148 Mbps @2.4GHz
Ethernet Ports	1x 2.5Gbps WAN Port 7x 2.5Gbps LAN Ports	1 x 2.5G WAN Port 1 x 10G WAN/LAN Port 4 x 1G LAN Ports
USB Ports	1x USB 3.2 Gen 1	1 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Port 1 x USB 2.0 Port
Game center	Game Boost / Acceleration Mobile Game Mode Gear Accelerator ROG_First OpenNAT (Game Profile) Gaming Port Gaming Network	Game Boost / Acceleration Game Radar WTFast UU boost ROG_First OpenNAT (Game Profile)
Processor	2.0 GHz Quad core CPU 256 MB Flash, 2GB RAM	64-bit 2.0 GHz quad-core CPU 256MB NAND flash and 1GB DDR4 RAM
Price	$399.99	$199.99

There’s also a noticeable difference in pricing. The GS-BE12000 is priced at roughly twice the cost of the GT-AX11000. Considering this, the GT-AX11000 can still be a very attractive option, especially since it delivers strong performance at about half the price of the newer model.

Click here for Asus GT-AXE11000 on Amazon (#Ad)

Now, let’s see how comparison between Asus and Archer perform, which one is suitable to meet your business need.

Asus Vs Archer Wifi 7 gaming routers

Next, let’s compare the Archer GE650 with the Asus GS-BE12000, using Table 3 below as a reference. Both fall into the same mid-range WiFi 7 gaming router category. They are tri-band BE11000 WiFi 7 standalone routers and include the 6GHz band, which offers a cleaner and less congested wireless experience. To take full advantage of this band, you can upgrade older devices with WiFi 7 USB adapters such as the Archer TBE401UH or the Asus ROG USB-BE92. These WiFi 7 adapters support the 6GHz band, helping you enjoy faster and more reliable connections.

Ethernet Ports

Both the Archer GE650 and the Asus ROG GS-BE12000 are built with gamers in mind, taking advantage of the fast WiFi 7 standard and features like MLO to deliver higher throughput. For smooth, low-latency internet connections, both routers support multi-gig speeds through their WAN ports. The Archer GE650 includes a 5Gbps WAN port, while the Asus GS-BE12000 supports up to 2.5Gbps. Some higher-end models go even further with 10Gbps WAN ports, making them more future-ready for upcoming DOCSIS 4.0 cable technology.

In terms of wired connectivity, the Asus ROG GS-BE12000 offers more Ethernet ports overall, while the Archer GE650 stands out with its faster 5Gbps ports for both WAN and LAN. Asus, on the other hand, provides multiple 2.5Gbps LAN ports for high-speed wired connections to several devices.

USB Port

As general, Asus with its USB port’ can be used as secondary internet connection (with 3G/4G dongle); in addition of primary wired Internet connection. This dual WAN system can be configured as failover or load balance scenario. In failover scenario, when your primary internet connection fails, the system will fall over to the secondary internet connection. On the other hand, Archer doesn’t support dual WAN. The USB port is for storage purpose only.

Game feature

Both the Archer and Asus routers are well suited for gaming households. They include features designed to optimize performance for responsive online gaming, smooth 4K/8K video streaming, video cameras (such as popular Logitech and Nexigo) and handling multiple connected devices at once. Each router also offers traffic prioritization and gaming acceleration tools to help keep gameplay smooth and lag-free.

Take a closer look at the comparison table below.

Table 4 Archer vs Asus wifi7 routers

	Archer GE650	Asus ROG Strix GS-BE12000
Wifi segment	Tri-band Be11000	Tri-band BE12000
	5764 Mbps @6GHz; 4323 Mbps @5GHz’ 574 Mbps @2.4GHz	5764 Mbps @5GHz; 2×2 5764 Mbps @5GHz; 4×4 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2
Antennas	4x optimally positioned internal antennas	8x internal antennas
Ethernet Ports	1x 5Gbps WAN port 1x 5Gbps LAN; 3x 2.5Gbps LAN	1x 2.5Gbps WAN Port 7x 2.5Gbps LAN Ports
USB Ports	1x USB 3.0	1x USB 3.2 Gen 1
Game center	Game accelerator ; Game panel; Game statistics; Dedicated gaming band	Game Boost / Acceleration Mobile Game Mode Gear Accelerator ROG_First OpenNAT (Game Profile) Gaming Port Gaming Network
Processor	Quad core CPU	2.0 GHz Quad core CPU 256 MB Flash, 2GB RAM
Price	$349.99	$399.99

Prices listed may not be the same as current ones. Click the product’s link below for current price and read more manufacturers’ details the product on Amazon.

Click here for Archer GE650 on Amazon (#Ad)
Or you may like Asus ROG GS-be12000 on Amazon (#Ad)

Related products

For compact all-in-one cable modem with built-in wifi router to reduce device clutter, you may consider compact device Arris G20. Click here for Arris G20 vs Netgear cax30 gateway.

For mesh wifi system, you like eero 7 vs Orbi – various models of entry level, middle range and high end categories of eero 7 series and Orbi.

Arris G20 vs Netgear Cax30 Which One is Suitable for you

By admin In arris g18 vs g20, arris g20, arris g20 vs cax30

Arris introduced few models of cable modem router combo, wifi router with built-in cable modem including G18, G20, G34, G36 and the latest G54. Netgear is one of its rival with its products: Netgear cax30 and cax80.

In this article:

Arris cable modem router combo
Arris cable modem router comparison
Arris vs Netgear
Comparison G20 vs Cax30

Arris cable modem router combo

Arris is a well-known manufacturer of cable modems, best known for its Surfboard series. If you look at the market today, you’ll find several Arris cable modems and cable modem–router combos, with Netgear being one of its main competitors.

One of Arris’s most popular standalone cable modems is the Surfboard S33, which uses the latest DOCSIS 3.1 technology and competes closely with the Netgear CM2000. Beyond standalone modems, Arris also offers a range of cable modem–router combo devices. These all-in-one units combine a cable modem and a Wi-Fi router into a single device. Arris’s G-series models – such as the G18, G20, G34, G36, and G54—are all built on DOCSIS 3.1 technology.

Products Comparison

The Arris Surfboard SBG8300 is another DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem–router combo, but it uses the older Wi-Fi 5 (AC2350) standard. In contrast, the newer G-series models support more modern Wi-Fi standards, with most offering Wi-Fi 6 and the latest G54 model stepping up to Wi-Fi 7.

So what sets the Arris G-series apart from one another? Table 1 below outlines the current Arris G lineup using DOCSIS 3.1 technology. The key differences come down to supported internet speeds, built-in Ethernet ports, and the Wi-Fi performance tier.

Table 1 Arris G Series comparison

	Built-in Wifi	Ethernet Ports	Internet Speed
G18	AX1800 Wifi 6	2x 1G	Up to 1Gbps
G20	AX3000 Wifi 6	2x 1G	Up to 1Gbps
G34	AX3000 Wifi 6	4x 1G	Up to 1Gbps
G36	AX3000 Wifi 6	1x 2.5G 4x 1G	Up to 2.5Gbps
G54	BE18000 Wifi 7	1x 10G 4x 1G	Up to 10Gbps

The G18, G20, and G34 come with built-in DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem with maximum internet speed up to 1Gbps, G36 supports up to 2.5Gbps. While the ultimate G54 series leveraging Wifi 7 standards support up to 10Gbps. You will find that the next generation of DOCSIS 4.0 supports multi-gig Internet speed up to 10Gbps and beyond.

Arris vs Netgear

One of the main rivals for Arris is Netgear. Netgear offers Cax30 and Cax80 that are main competitors for Arris G20, G34 and G36. We’ll focus on Arris G20 and compare it to Netgear Cax30 which the price gap is not much different.

See also comparison between Arris G36 vs Netgear cax80, has been discussed on separate article.

Table 2 below represents spec comparison between Arris Surfboard G20 and Netgear CAX30. Both products come with built-in DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem featuring OFDM 2×2 and 32 x 8 Channel bonding. Both support cable internet speed up to 1Gbps, appropriate for home internet need for work and play. You can work from home remotely with your Logitech or Nexigo 4k webcams smoothly, your kids play online games responsively and other family members connect to media social simultaneously with no lagging.

Port interfaces

With home wifi network in place, all the laptops, computer and mobile devices connect wirelessly. However, in some instances you also need wired connection such as game console, printer or other desktop computers and NAS.

Arris G20 allows you to connect up to 2 devices with wired connection. On the other hand Netgear cax30 gives you double number of Ethernet ports for wired connection (4x 1G LAN ports).

Another advantage for Netgear Cax30 is the USB port you can connect USB disk for storage share across the network.

Comparison table

Table 2 Arris G20 vs Netgear cax30

Model	Surfboard G20	Netgear Cax30
Wifi technology	Dual band AX3000	Dual band ax2700 wifi 6 with 6 streams
Signal rates	1,200Mbps @2.4GHz; 1,800Mbps @5GHz	0.9Gbps @2.4 GHz; 1.8Gbps @5GHz;
Modem	Built-in DOCSIS 31 cable modem OFDM 2×2 + 32 x 8 Channel bonding	Built-in DOCSIS 31 cable modem OFDM 2×2 + 32 x 8 Channel bonding
Ethernet ports	2x 1G LAN Ports	4x 1.0Gbps LAN Ports, dual gigabit Ethernet port aggregation
USB port	N/A	1x USB 3.0 port for share storage
Processor	Unspecified	1.5GHz dual core processor
Dimension	10.87 in x 9.92 in x 3.31 in / (276 mm x 251,9 mm x 84 mm)	10.0 in x 8.3 in x 4.3 in / (254 mm x 211 mm x 110 mm)
Weight	3.15 pounds / 1043 gram	2.10 lb / 0.95 kg
Price	$297.00	$282.00

Price gap between the two products is not too much, almost the same over the time. Click the product’s link below to learn more details of manufacturer’s descriptions and spec on Amazon.

Click here to SHOP Arris G20 on Amazon (#Ad)
Or you may like to see Netgear Cax30 on Amazon (#Ad)

All-in-one or separate devices

An all-in-one product is a compact device, eliminating clutter of devices at home. However, an all-in-one product such as Arris G20 or Netgear Cax30 is a single point of failure product. In case of you need to upgrade your network to the latest wifi 7 standards, you need to get rid of this device and replace it with faster one such as Arris G54. Arrs G54 comes with the latest wifi7 standards.

So if you like to be flexible in the future, a separate modem device plus wifi router is a better solution instead of an all-in-one device like G20 and Cax30. In this case, when you invest for example Arris S33 you can add the wifi router leveraging from previous wifi standards (wifi 5, wifi 6) up to latest wifi 7.

Related products

For large homes with high dens connected devices, you may consider mesh wifi system, consider popular Orbi or eero 7 products, you can select suitable products ranging from the entry level, middle range tier, or high end products.

For standalone routers, you may like to consider either Asus ax3000 or entry level be3600 wifi 7 routers. Click here Asus ax3000 or be3600 wifi 7 routers.

Orbi vs eero 7 Which One is suitable for your business need

By admin In Orbi 370 vs eero 7, Orbi 770 vs eero 7 pro, orbi 870 vs eero max 7, orbi vs eero 7

Netgear introduces various models of wifi7 products, and the Orbi series leveraging wifi7 standards compete tightly with well known eero 7 series. How good Orbi vs eero 7 series perform?

In this article:

Orbi products vs eero 7 series
Eero 7 series
Orbi 370 vs eero 7
Orbi 770 vs eero 7 pro
Orbi 870 vs eero max 7

Orbi mesh wifi 7 vs eero

WiFi 7 is now widely available, and all major networking brands have launched products built on this latest standard. TP-Link was one of the first to bring WiFi 7 devices to market, ahead of other brands such as Netgear, Asus, and Amazon with its popular eero lineup.

Unlike Netgear, TP-Link, and Asus – which offer a wide range of WiFi 7 models – Amazon has kept its lineup simple, releasing just three eero 7 series (plus an outdoor model). In this section, let’s focus on the Orbi 7 series, which is often compared directly with the eero 7.

Eero7 series

eero is a well-known networking brand, especially for its mesh Wi-Fi systems that are designed to deliver smooth and reliable coverage across homes and offices. It became popular thanks to its easy setup and simple app-based management, making it a great choice for people who want hassle-free Wi-Fi.

The brand is known for keeping things simple while still offering stable performance, even in larger spaces with many connected devices. eero systems generally perform well and handle multiple devices without much trouble. That said, eero products are usually priced a bit higher compared to similar options from brands like TP-Link and Netgear.

Eero 7 Lineup Series

Netgear offers various models of Orbi 7 series, while so far Amazon offers three series of eero products leveraging wifi 7 standards that represent lower end; middle range and high end tier each.

Eero max 7 as the high end product
Eero 7 pro as the middle range tier
Eero 7 as the lower end category.

Eero 7 comparison

So, what differentiates the three series? Broadly speaking, the eero 7 pro costs twice as much as the eero 7 (entry-level), while the eero max 7 costs twice as much as the eero 7 pro. You might expect the performance to also double at each higher tier. Frankly speaking, the aggregated bandwidth is double at each higher level, so is the internet speed it can support. Orbi 7 series are almost the same.

The entry level is dual band system, while the other two series are tri-band mesh system. Take a closer look at the following spec comparison table for the three eero series.

Table 1 eero lineup comparison

Eero models	Eero 7	Eero 7 Pro	Eero Max 7
Wifi technology	Dual band BE5000	Tri-band BE10800	Tri-band BE20800
Signal rates	688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2 4324 Mbps @5GHz 2×2	5765 Mbps @6GHz 2×2 4324 Mbps @5GHz 2×2 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	11,530Mbps @6GHz 4×4 8,647Mbps @5GHz 4×4 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2
Ethernet Ports	2x 2.5 Gbps	2x 5 GbE	2x 10.0Gbps 2x 2.5Gbps
Maximum Internet Plan	Up to 2Gbps	Up to 5.0 Gbps	Up to 10Gbps
Processor	1.1 GHz quad-core processor Memory: 1024 MB; 4 GB flash	1.5 GHz quad-core processor Memory 1024 MB; 4GB flash	Quad-core A73 processor, 2GB RAM, 4GB flash storage
Prices	$279.99 (3-pack)	$549.99 (3-pack)	$1,189.99 (3-pack)

Click here to see eero 7 series on Amazon (#Ad)

See also the previous models eero 6 pro vs Orbi; eero leveraging wifi 6 standard and Orbi.

Available 6GHz adapters

In the present landscape, the wifi 6e and wifi 7 products come with 6GHz radio band (not all models come with this new 6Ghz band), and the question is always arise: are there any wifi adapters that support 6GHz radio band? Yes, you can notice few vendors introduce their wifi adapters that support 6GHz radio band such as Tp-Link Archer Tbe401uh BE6200 Tri-Band, or you can find Netgear A9000 BE6500 USB adapter, or budget friendly adapters Brostrend BE6500 adapter half the price of Archer. You can upgrade you computers / laptops that come with USB 3.0 port to use this wifi 7 adapters.

See also comparison between eero 7 vs deco series, similar products with large price gaps. Or you may also like to see Asus mesh 7 vs eero 7 products, comparison dual WAN capable routers versus eero with built-in Zigbee smart home.

Orbi comparable products

As we have figure out eero series in each of category, Netgear introduced comparable products as rivals on the market with its Orbi series.

One thing to note is that Orbi is different; it is not like eero, deco, nor Asus which are interchangeable in nature, each unit can either as router or satellite. Orbi differentiates between router units and satellite units. So, only the Orbi router unit that comes with WAN port, so the satellite units only come with LAN ports.

Table 2 Orbi 7 series comparison

Orbi series	Orbi 370	Orbi 770	Orbi 870
Network segment	Dual-band BE5000	Tri-band BE11000	Tri-band BE21000
Ethernet Ports	Router: 1x 2.5G WAN port 1x 2.5G LAN port Satellite: 1x 2.5G LAN port	Router: 1x 2.5G WAN port 3x 2.5G LAN port Satellite: 3x 2.5G LAN port	Router: 1x 10G WAN port 4x 2.5G LAN ports Satellite: 4x 2.5G LAN ports
Processor	Quad-core 1.5 GHz processor; Memory: 512 MB flash and 1 GB RAM	Quad-core 1.5GHz processor; Memory: 4GB flash and 2GB RAM	Quad-core 1.5 GHz processor; Memory: 4 GB flash and 2GB RAM
Price	$289.99 (3-pack)	$699.99 (3-pack)	$889.99 (3-pack)

In terms of price points, both low end and middle range products are competitive. However, the price gap for the high end tiers is quite large. Let’s start with the entry level category.

Entry level Orbi vs eero 7

Both the entry level of eero 7 and Orbi 370 series are tagged with competitive price. The features are almost the same, including the aggregated bandwidth, the port interfaces, and the quad core processor. The embedded processor is the same, but the memory capacity is different. Eero series all come with larger memory to manage and control high traffic and simultaneous multiple loads and other complex algorithm for eero Truemesh technology.

Built-in Zigbee

The main difference between the two is the Zigbee feature. All the eero system feature built-in Zigbee smart home that allow you to connect and control low-power smart home devices with Alexa without needing a separate, dedicated hub. On the other hand, all Orbi series don’t have this feature. So, when built-in Zigbee matters to your business, eero 7 series would the best option.

Table 3 Entry level Orbi vs eero 7

Entry level wifi7	Orbi 370 Series	Eero 7 series
Network segment	Dual-band BE5000	Dual band BE5000
Signal rates	4324 Mbps @5 GHz 688 Mbps @2.4 GHz	4324 Mbps @5 GHz 688 Mbps @2.4 GHz
Coverage	6,000 sq ft	6,000 sq ft
Ethernet Ports	Router: 1x 2.5G WAN port 1x 2.5G LAN port Satellite: 1x 2.5G LAN port	2x 2.5 Gbps WAN/LAN
Built-in Zigbee	N/A	Yes
Processor	Quad-core 1.5 GHz processor; Memory: 512 MB flash and 1 GB RAM	1.1 GHz quad-core processor Memory: 1024 MB; 4 GB flash
Price	$289.99 (3-pack)	$279.99 (3-pack)

The demand for this low-end product category is quite large, so it is no wonder that all vendors are introducing their products with better performance and affordable prices.

Middle range Orbi vs eero

Now let’s switch to middle range category products, which the price tagged are double as much as the low end ones. Table 4 below represents spec comparison table between Orbi 770 series and eero 7 pro. Both products are tri-band products deliver the same aggregated bandwidth be11000, come with 6GHz radio band as the nature feature of wifi7 standards.

See also comparison between Orbi 770 series vs Deco.

Port interfaces

The entry level of Orbi 370 come with only one LAN port (two for router unit), while this middle range product Orbi 770 series come with 3 multi-gig LAN ports and 2.5Gbps WAN port for the router unit. On the other hand eero 7 pro comes with only two ports. However, eero is ready for high speed internet speed up to 5GHz as opposed to Orbi which supports only up to 2.5Gbps internet speed.

Table 4 Orbi vs eero 7 pro

Entry level wifi7	Orbi 770 Series (3-pack)	Eero 7 pro series (3-pack)
Network segment	Tri-band BE11000	Tri-band BE11000
Signal rates	5765 Mbps @6GHz 2×2 4324 Mbps @5GHz 2×2 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	5765 Mbps @6GHz 2×2 4324 Mbps @5GHz 2×2 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2
Coverage	8,000 sq ft	6,000 sq ft
Ethernet Ports	Router: 1x 2.5G WAN port 3x 2.5G LAN ort Satellite: 3x 2.5G LAN port	2x 5G
Built-in Zigbee	N/A	Yes
Processor	Quad-core 1.5GHz processor; Memory: 4GB flash and 2GB RAM	1.5 GHz quad-core processor Memory 1024 MB; 4GB flash
Price	$699.99 (3-pack)	$549.99 (3-pack)

The price gap between these two middle range products is quite large. Prices are fluctuating over time, you may like to check the current price on Amazon and get the best deal.

Click here for Orbi 770 series on Amazon (#Ad)

Orbi 870 vs eero max 7

The high end Orbi 870 series is supposed to compete with eero max 7. Eero max 7 is the first eero product leveraging wifi 7 standards before finally introduced two more series each for low end and middle range tier products.

So what sets them apart? Take a look at the comparison in Table 5 below.

Both models fall into the same high-end category at the be21000 network segment with tri-band system. All the three bands are evenly matched, both 5GHz and 6GHz bands offering 4×4 data throughput. In practical terms, if you have two devices with 2×2 MU-MIMO, the router can send two data streams to each device simultaneously.

Ethernet Ports

On the port interfaces, both the Orbi 870 series and eero Max 7 include multi-gig 10GbE Ethernet ports. eero max 7 offers 2x 10G ports you can either use it for WAN / LAN connection. On the other hand, Orbi 870 series only come with one 10G WAN port on the router unit, the satellite only come equipped with 4x 2.5G LAN ports.

This means both systems can handle multi-gig 10Gbps internet speed, and is ready for the future DOCSIS 4.0 infrastructure. If you require super fast 10G LAN connection eero max 7 come equipped with the 10G port that support this speed. You can connect to high speed NAS with 10G port such as Ugreen NASync DXP4800.

Table 5 Orbi 870 vs eero max 7

Entry level wifi7	Orbi 870 Series	Eero Max 7 series (3-pack)
Network segment	Tri-band BE21000	Tri-band BE21000
Signal rates	11,520Mbps @6GHz 4×4; 8,640Mbps @5GHz 4×4; 688Mbps @2.4GHz	11,530Mbps @6GHz 4×4 8,647Mbps @5GHz 4×4 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2
Coverage	9,000 sq ft	7,500 sq ft
Ethernet Ports	Router: 1x 10G WAN port 4x 2.5G LAN ports Satellite: 4x 2.5G LAN ports	2x 10.0Gbps 2x 2.5Gbps
Built-in Zigbee	N/A	Yes
Processor	Quad-core 1.5 GHz processor; Memory: 4 GB flash and 2GB RAM	Quad-core A73 processor, 2GB RAM, 4GB flash storage
Price	$1,299.99 (3-pack)	$1,189.99 (3-pack)

Best deal on Amazon for limited time is $899.99 (3-pack) for Orbi 870 series, Amazon eero max 7 is still the same. However, the price might dropped over time, especially when the new products introduced to the market.

Click here for eero 7 max on Amazon (#Ad)
Or you may like to see Orbi 770 series on Amazon (#Ad)

Related products

For standalone routers, you may also consider Asus vs Archer be3600, see if you need to upgrade your legacy ax3000 routers to entry level BE3600 routers. Or you may also consider upgrading your legacy mesh wifi6 Deco X60 to be3600 system. See Legacy Deco x60 vs Orbi.

Asus AX3000 vs TP-Link Wifi 6 Or BE3600 Wifi 7 routers?

By admin In asus ax3000, asus ax3000 vs tplink, asus be3600 vs archer

In addition to low-end products that have a large market share, the mid-range of WiFi 6 routers between the AX3000 and AX6000, also has a significant market share. Given that the price difference between low-end and mid-range products is small, while the specification difference is quite large. Several popular products in this wifi6 mid-range segment are worth considering, including Asus AX3000, and TP-Link AX3000 routers, are they still worth buying amid the emerging of wifi 7 products?

In this article

Asus AX3000 Routers
Asus RT-AX58 vs Asus GS-AX3000
TP-Link AX3000 Routers
Asus AX3000 vs TP-Link AX3000
Asus be3600 vs TP-Link

Asus AX3000 Routers

Asus introduced various models of standard and gaming routers, ranging from entry level ax1800, ax3000 routers up to ultimate axe16000 routers leveraging wifi 6/6e standards. Even today, you can find next generation of wifi 7 routers such as Asus RT-BE96U BE19000 and GT-BE25000 wifi 7 routers. Let’s focus on middle range wifi6 segment, Asus ax3000 routers.

You may like to read middle range of mesh wifi7 Asus BT10 vs Deco be75, when you need to upgrade to mesh wifi7 network.

Asus RT-AX58U vs GS-AX3000

In this ax3000 network segment, Asus offers standard RT-AX58u router and Asus ROG GS-AX3000 gaming router.

Take a look at the following spec comparison table. Since both router series are designed with the same ax3000 network segment, there is not much technical difference between the two series except the gaming feature. So if you are a gamer in mind and require entry level gear to support the fast responsive gaming, Asus ROG GS-ax3000 router would be the better choice.

See also Asus vs eero mesh wifi 7, popular dual WAN capable mesh versus built-in Zigbee smart home mesh wifi 7 products.

Aimesh

If this product is your first Asus ax router, if one day you need to cover larger area, you can add Asus AiMesh compliant products such as Asus XD4 mini or higher tier. Aimesh feature assures compatibility with other aimesh products to create whole home network. Or probably you may upgrade to Asus BE3600 router leveraging the latest wifi7 standards.

Table 1 Asus AX3000 Series

Asus AX3000 Model	Asus RT-AX58U	Asus ROG GS-AX3000
Dual band ax3000 (2402 + 574 Mbps) with AiMesh	Yes	Yes
Ethernet Ports: 1Gbps WAN and 4x Gigabit LAN ports	Yes	Yes
USB Ports 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1	Yes	Yes
Gaming Feature	Game Boost / Acceleration ROG_First OpenNAT (Game Profile) Gaming Port	Traditional QoS
Processor: 1.5GHz Tri-core processor 256 MB Flash + 512 MB RAM	Yes	Yes
Price (MSRP)	$179.99	$ 199.99

The listed prices may be much different with current price; the prices are dropped over time. So that’s why opting the product with current wifi7 is recommended, and Asus offers budget-friendly product Asus RT-BE58U leveraging the latest wifi standards (802.11.be). With this Asus be58U, you get better interface including 2.5Gbps WAN port, 4x Gig LAN ports, and total bandwidth is 3,600Mbps (2882Mbps @5GHz + 688Mbps @2.4GHz).

What is Asus competitor in middle range ax3000 routers?

TP-Link AX3000

One of its competitors in this ax3000 network segment is TP-Link which also introduced various models of wifi 6/6e products ranging from entry level ax1800 up to ultimate ax16000. Even TP-Link becomes the pioneer in unveiling consumer routers based on latest generation of wifi standards (802.11.be) including Archer BE900 wifi-7 router and Deco BE63 mesh wifi-7.

TP-Link’s most popular AX3000 WiFi 6 router is the Archer AX55. This model comes in two variants: standard and pro. The main difference is that the pro version has a 2.5 Gbps WAN port instead of 1Gbps.

See also legacy Deco X60 vs Orbi, middle range of wifi6 mesh.

TP-Link AX3000 or Archer BE3600

You might be wondering whether you should consider the older TP-Link AX3000 or the new Archer BE3600 that utilizes the latest WiFi 7 standards.

First, you can consider the technology used in the product. The Archer AX3000 is based on the older WiFi 6 standards, while the Archer BE3600 uses the latest standard (WiFi 7). Investing in the BE3600 means being one step ahead technologically compared to the Archer AX3000.

Port Interfaces

Unlike the Archer AX3000, the Archer BE3600 is equipped with a multi-Gig port, a 2.5G WAN port, and a 2.5G LAN port in addition to three 1G LAN ports. This makes the BE3600 ready for future multi-Gig internet speed upgrades, especially when DOCSIS 4.0 cable infrastructure is ready to be implemented.

Table 2 Archer ax3000 vs be3600

TP-Link Model	TP-Link Archer AX55	TP-Link BE3600
Wifi Segment	Dual band AX3000 wifi 6	Dual band BE3600 wifi 7
Signal rates	2402Mbps @5GHz 574 Mbps @2.4GHz	2882Mbps @5GHz 688Mbps @2.4GHz
Ethernet Ports	1x 1G WAN 4x 1G LAN	1x 2.5G WAN 1x 2.5G LAN 3x 1G LAN
USB Ports	1x USB 3.0	1x USB 3.0
Price	$80.00	$119.99

Price point gap is not too large; meaning spending slightly more bucks for investing be3600 would be more advantage than older model ax3000. Click the product’s link below to learn more details on see the current price and best deal on Amazon.

Click here for Archer AX3000 on Amazon (#Ad)

Now we return to the initial topic, asus ax3000 or TP-Link AX3000 router, or should we switch to latest wifi 7 routers.

Asus ax3000 vs TP-Link

If you stick with the wifi 6 router models, let’s take a look at the differences in the specs between Asus AX3000 and Arcer ax3000 as shown on the table 3 below.

Archer AX55 pro comes with 2.5Gbps WAN port which is ready for future internet speed upgrade. While Asus only comes with 1G WAN port and 4x 1G LAN ports, so in the future if you require internet speed upgrade up to 2G, you cannot.

The other spec difference is the processing speed. Asus RT-AX58U comes equipped with tri-core as opposed to only dual core on Archer AX55 Pro. In terms of processor performance, Asus AX3000 is the better choice.

Table 3 Asus ax3000 vs archer

AX3000 model	Asus RT-AX58	Archer AX55 Pro
Wifi segment	Dual band ax3000 (574 Mbps @2.4GHz; 2402 Mbps @5GHz)	Dual band ax3000 (574 Mbps @2.4GHz; 2402 Mbps @5GHz)
Ethernet Ports	4x Gigabit LAN; 1x Gigabit WAN	1x 2.5 Gigabit WAN/LAN Port 1x Gigabit WAN/LAN Port 3x Gigabit LAN Ports
USB ports	1x USB 3.1 Gen 1	1x USB 3.0 port 1x USB 2.0 Port
Processor	1.5 GHz tri-core processor with Memory 256 MB Flash 512 MB RAM	Dual core Qualcomm processor
Price	$179.99	$144.99

The price point for each of the ax3000 product is slightly different. What about the entry level of wifi7 routers offered by both vendors? Should you switch or upgrade your legacy devices to wifi7?

See also high speed Asus axe11000 vs Netgear raxe500, previous models of wifi 6e standalone routers.

Asus BE3600 vs Archer

The entry level of wifi7 segment is be3600; most networking vendors introduce this entry level products including Asus with its rt-be58u, and tp-link with its archer be230 wifi7 routers. Wifi7 with its nature MLO (Multi link operation) feature is powerful. It allows a single device to connect simultaneously across multiple frequency bands. The previous wifi standards don’t have this kind of MLO feature.

Take a look at the following table 4 that represents spec comparison table between asus rt-be58u and archer be230 routers. Both are dual band be2300 entry level of wifi7 standalone routers on the market.

Ethernet Ports

Both products support multi-gig Internet connection with their 2.5Gbps WAN port. Unlike Asus, Archer be230 is embedded with 2.5Gbps LAN port. However, with internet connection under 1Gbps speed, you can enable the 1Gbps WAN port for internet connection and 2.5Gbps port as LAN port.

So in terms of LAN port, Archer is more advantage when you subscribe multi-gig internet speed up to 2G. so you still have one 2.5G LAN port for high speed NAS or other wired LAN connected devices.

Dual WAN

Both asus be3600 and TP-Link routers come equipped with USB 3.0 port for storage share. However, Asus rt-be58u allows you to connect USB 4g/5g dongle for secondary Internet connection in either Failover or load balance configuration.

Table 4 Asus be3600 vs Archer

Model	Asus RT-BE58U	TP-Link Archer BE230
Wifi segment	Dual band be3600 with Aimesh support	Dual band be3600 with Easymesh support
Signal rates	2882Mbps @5GHz 688Mbps @2.4GHz	2882Mbps @5GHz 688Mbps @2.4GHz
Ethernet Ports	1x 2.5G for WAN/LAN, 1x 1G for WAN/LAN, 3 x 1G LAN,	1x 2.5Gbps WAN Port 1x 2.5Gbps LAN port 3x 1G LAN ports
USB Ports	1x USB 3.2 Gen 1. 4G/5G mobile Tethering USB storage share	1x USB 3.0 Storage share
Dual WAN supports	Yes,	N/A
Processor	2.0 GHz quad-core processor Memory: 256 MB Flash; 1 GB RAM	Next generation of 2.0 Quad core processor
Security	AiProtection and advanced VPNs	TP-Link Homeshield
Price	$129.99	$119.99

Prices gap for wifi 6/6e products and wifi 7 products are not large, just slightly difference. So, it is recommended to switch to latest generations of wifi7 products instead of legacy ones. This will assure compatibility with other compliant connected devices that will be coming on the future.

Prices listed may not be current, click the product’s link to see current price on Amazon and learn more manufacturer’s description.

Click here to SHOP Asus RT-BE58U on Amazon (#Ad)
Or you may like to Click here for Archer BE3600 on Amazon (#Ad)

Related products

For legacy powerline backhaul products, you may like to see Asus XP4 and Deco P9 mesh wifi 6 with Powerline backhaul.

For webcam requirement, consider the popular and budget friendly 4k webcams, Click here for Nexigo vs Logitech 4k webcams.

Legacy Deco X60 vs Orbi Is It Still worth Buying

By admin In deco x60, deco x60 vs be23, deco x60 vs orbi

After the success of its WiFi 5 product through its debut, the Deco M5, as the WiFi 6 standard emerged at that time, TP-Link introduced the Deco X20 and X60. Currently, the WiFi 7 standard is available, and TP-Link is utilizing this latest WiFi standard into their products, from entry-level products such as the Deco BE23 and BE25 to high-end products. Are those legacy wifi6 products still worth buying?

In this article:

Deco ax3000
Deco x60 vs Deco x55
Deco x60 vs BE23
Deco X60 vs Orbi Rbk750

TP-Link Deco AX3000

Deco x60 is the second wifi 6 products after its successful with its wifi6 debut, deco x20 ax1800. X20 successfully competed with similar products on the market such as Netgear mk62. X60 is twice as much bandwidth as X20, and how those legacy products compete amid the emerging of wifi 7 products on the market?

Currently there are few Deco ax3000 models on the market including:

X60 – the first tplink series in ax3000
X55 – the second series in ax3000
X50 POE – Powerline backhaul

What makes them set apart?

Deco x60 vs Deco x55

Both deco x60 and x55 are designed with the same ax3000 network segment, dual band delivering bandwidth up to 867Mbps @5GHz and 400Mbps @2.4GHz. The x60 uses 4x internal antennas, while the x55 only uses two internal dual band antennas with AI-driven mesh technology. All the latest Deco series currently come with the same AI Mesh technology.

Ethernet Ports

All previous deco series ranging from deco m5, m9 plus, x20, x25 (new series of deco ax1800), x60, and x90, come with only two 1G Ethernet ports. However, the newer x55 model comes with three 1G ports. all the Ethernet ports feature WAN/LAN auto sensing. This means all unit can be interchangeable, can work either as router or satellite node.

With three Ethernet ports, you can configure wired backhaul using star backhaul topology for three node mesh without adding a switch. Deco x60 with 3-pack, you need to add a non-managed switch for star backhaul topology. Unless, you need to configure them using daisy chain wired backhaul topology.

The other thing you also need to know is that these two series can either work as mesh wifi router (default mode) or wireless access point mode. You can change from the ‘Change operation mode’ menu and select Access Point radio button. In this case, your modem in home is not a native modem but modem gateway either wired or wireless gateway such as Motorola mg8702 or Asus cmax600.

As a best practice, if you have to use this deco x60 to work as wireless Access Point in business wireless network, it’s better not to use deco products, but use native wifi AP device that is designed to work as wireless AP such as tplink Omada series.

Deco Comparison table

See more details on the following comparison table below.

Table 1. tplink deco x60 vs deco x55

Deco ax3000	Tplink deco x60	Tplink deco x55
Simultaneous dual band ax3000 (867Mbps + 400Mbps)	Yes	Yes
Internal antennas	4x internal antennas with beamforming	2x internal antennas with beamforming and AI-driven mesh
Number of data streams	6 streams	4 streams
Ethernet Ports	2x Gigabit WAN/ LAN ports	3x Gigabit WAN/ LAN ports
Network security: Malicious Site Checker Port Intrusion Prevention Infected Device Isolation	Yes: Antivirus with the addition of notification and log	Yes, Home-Shield security with real-time IoT protection; DDoS attack prevention; Home network scanner.
Guest network each radio band	Yes	Yes
Quality of services	QoS by Device and Application	QoS by device
Router mode or AP mode	Yes	Yes
1GHz dual core CPU	Yes	Yes
Dimension: 4.33 × 4.33 × 4.99 in / (110 × 110 × 114 mm)	Yes	Yes

Deco x60 vs BE23

The latest wifi-7 standard has been around, and most vendors introduce their products leveraging this new wifi standard. TP-link introduced deco be23 and be25 for its low end wifi7 products, and other ones in middle to high end products. With this wifi7 products emerging, are deco x60 and other similar products still worth buying?

They are still worth, off course. With the new technology, mostly the products leveraging this wifi standard come with higher price tag. If the high speed demand is not an urgent case, you still can use legacy products with budget friendly.

Let’s take new deco be23 that comes with current wifi7 standards, and compare it with the legacy x60 series and see how they set apart.

Faster capacity

Deco be23 and be25 is the lower end deco products leveraging wifi7 standards. Be23 and be25 come equipped with 2.5G auto sensing WAN/LAN ports. They can support internet speed up to 2G, easily connect to current high speed DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem that come with 2.5G ports.

With your current connected devices with legacy wifi6, they can support for sure, since the new wifi standards are designed to be backward compatible with previous one. However, when you upgrade all your connected devices to be wifi7 compliant, you get the best speed possible wifi7 can deliver.

Currently there are few models of USB wifi7 adapters on the market such as TP-Link Archer TBE401UH, or you may consider budget friendly BrosTrend BE6500.

Table 2 Deco x60 vs be23

Deco series	Deco X60	Deco BE23
Wifi segment	Dual band AX3000 wifi 6	Dual band be3600 wifi 7
Signal rates	867 Mbps @5GHz 400Mbps @2.4GHz	2882 Mbps @5GHz 688 Mbps @2.4GHz
Antennas	4x internal antennas with beamforming	4x high performance internal antennas
Coverage	6,000 sq ft (3-pack)	6,500 sq ft (3-pack)
Ethernet Ports	2x 1G WAN/ LAN ports	2x 2.5Gbps
Processor	1GHz dual core CPU	Quad core processor
Price	$139.99 (3-pack)	$249.99 (3-pack)

There are still legacy products on the market that are still worth of purchasing such as Orbi rbk750 which is comparable with deco x60.

Deco X60 vs Orbi Rbk750

Deco x60 and Orbi rbk750 don’t work at the same network segment, however the work at slightly different network segment. X60 is a dual band ax3000, while rbk750 is a tri-band ax4200. Orbi uses one of its 5GHz bands as dedicated backhaul link between the nodes. On the other hand deco uses wifi backhaul shared with other connected devices. There always bandwidth allocation for wifi backhaul, even though you use ired backhaul.

Deco doesn’t specifically specify which radio band is used as the wifi backhaul link between nodes, however TP-link uses APS (Adaptive Path Selection) which means that the connection between these nodes adapts to the needs via which radio band is best available when it comes to connecting between nodes for best backhaul link.

Ethernet Ports

Unlike deco units which are interchangeable in nature, Orbi is not. Orbi units distinct which one is router, and which one is satellite unit. Orbi routers come with WAN port, but the Orbi satellites don’t. So, if the Orbi router fails, you cannot switch it with the other satellite node to work as the router. With Deco, you can do that, they come with Ethernet ports that feature WAN/LAN auto sensing.

See also Asus vs eero 7 wifi7 products, dual WAN support versus eero with built-in Zigbee.

Internet speed

Deco x60 supports internet speed up to 1G, so does Orbi. However with Orbi, if you require multi-gig internet speed, you can aggregate WAN port with another Ethernet port #1 to connect to cable modem that supports dual Gigabit port and feature aggregation link. You may consider Netgear CM2100 which supports aggregation link.

Currently, the wifi7 products support Multi-gig internet speed at list 2.5Gbps. Orbi 370 series, the new entry level wifi7 products comes with 2.5Gbps WAN port, so does new Deco be23 and be25. See also Orbi 370 vs Deco be25 entry level wifi7 products, you may see the prices are cheaper than legacy products.

Table 2 Deco X60 vs Orbi AX4200

Model	TP Link Deco X60 (3-packs)	Orbi RBK752 (2 pack)
Wifi technology	Dual band AX3000 6 streams	Tri-band AX4200
Wifi speeds	2402Mbps @ 5GHz 574Mbps @ 2.4GHz	2400Mbps @ 5GHz band 1 1200Mbps @ 5GHz band 2 1,200Mbps @ 2.4GHz
Antennas	4x internal antennas each unit	Six (6) high performance internal antennas with high-powered ampliﬁers
Range coverage	7,000 sq ft	5,000 sq ft
Ethernet Port	2 LAN/WAN Gigabit Ethernet Ports	Router: 1x 1 Gigabit WAN port Link aggregation using WAN port and a Gigabit Ethernet port (2Gbps) 3x Gigabit LAN ports For satellite: 2x Gigabit LAN ports
Backhaul	wifi and Optional wired Ethernet backhaul	Up to 2,400Mbps @5GHz dedicated link between router to satellite Optional wired backhaul
Wifi features	MU-MIMO, Auto path selection, self-healing, AP steering, Band steering, Beamforming	Implicit & Explicit Beamforming for 2.4GHz & 5GHz bands, MU-MIMO,
Modes	Mesh router / Access Point modes	Mesh router
Processor	Quad core processor	Quad core 1.4GHz CPU with 512MB NAND Flash and 1GB RAM
Price	$139.99 (3-pack)	$306.00 /3-pack

The price list may different with current one. Click the product’s link below to see the current price and see best deal on Amazon.

Click here to SHOP Deco X60 (3-packs) (#Ad)
Or you may like to SHOP Orbi rbk752 (#Ad)

Related products

For standalone routers, you may like to consider Asus BE3600 vs Netgear RS100 vs Archer, the standalone routers leveraging wifi7 standards. Or you may also consider higher speed of GL Inet Flint 3 vs Netgear vs Archer, standalone routers for middle range wifi7 network.

Dual WAN Asus vs eero 7 Smart home which one is better for you?

By admin In asus be5000 vs eero 7, asus bq16 vs eero, asus bt6 vs eero, asus vs eero

Asus introduces various models of mesh wifi 7 products ranging from low end, middle tiers up to high end products. How do Asus vs eero 7 comparable products perform, which one is suitable for your home need?

In this article

Asus vs eero mesh wifi 7
Asus vs eero 7 comparable products
BD5 vs eero 7
BT6 vs eero 7 pro
BQ16 vs eero max 7

Asus vs eero mesh wifi 7

Asus introduces few models of mesh wifi 7 products in all network categories. In low end network category, you can notice Asus BD4 and BD5. In the middle range segment, you can find Asus BT6, BT8, and Asus BT10. While in the high end network segment, you can find Asus BQ16, and BQ16 pro.

On the other hand, Amazon introduces only one eero model in each network category. Eero max 7 is the first wifi7 model released to the market, it is the highest eero model so far. In the middle range category, you can find eero 7 pro. And the low end category, eero 7 is the most popular among the others.

Most Asus middle to high end products feature dual WAN support. On the other hand, eero products come with build-in Zigbee smart home. This Zigbee is a smart home hub that allows you to connect and control low-power smart home devices with Alexa. So, you don’t need to purchase separate smart home hub.

See also eero 7 vs deco series, comparable deco series vs eero 7 series in each of network segment.

Asus vs eero 7 comparable products

Unlike eero that offers one series in each of network category range, Asus does few models. The following table 1 shows you three models of Asus wifi7 series which each of them is comparable with eero 7 in low end, middle tier and high end categories.

In low end category, Asus BD5 dual band be500 is comparable with eero 7, Asus BT6 tri-band be9400 should be comparable with eero 7 pro in middle range category, while in the high end category Asus BQ16 quad band be25000 should be comparable with eero max 7.

Asus bd5 is a dual band mesh wifi 7, with the absent of 6GHz band which is the nature feature of wifi 7 standards. While the other two series, come with 6GHz band for faster, cleaner and less interference band. Both BD5 and BT6 support internet speed up to 2.5Gbps, ideal for any home size or business need. However, when your business requires multi-gig 10G internet speed you may consider Asus BQ16 that comes with 10G WAN port.

Asus Comparison table

Table 1 Asus models

Asus wifi 7 products	Asus BD5	Asus BT6	Asus BQ16
Wifi 7 segment	Dual band be5000	Tri-band BE9400	Quad-band BE25000
Signal rates	4323Mbps @5GHz; 2×2 688Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	5762Mbps @6GHz 2×2 2882Mbps @5GHz 2×2 688Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	11529Mbps @6GHz 4×4 5764Mbps @5GHz 4×4; 5764Mbps @5GHz 4×4; 1376Mbps @2.4GHz 4×4
Antennas	4x Internal antennas	7x internal antennas	12x Internal antennas with 16x high front end module
Ethernet Ports	2x 2.5G WAN/LAN auto sensing	1x 2.5G WAN; 3x 1G LAN	1x 10G LAN/WAN 1x 1G LAN/WAN; 1x 10G LAN 2x 1G LAN
USB Ports	N/A	1x USB 3.0	1x USB 3.0
Dual WAN	N/A	Yes	Yes
Processor	1.5GHz Quad core processor	2.0 GHz Quad core processor	2.6 GHz quad core processor
Memory	512 MB RAM 128MB Flash	1GB RAM 128 MB Flash	2GB RAM 256 MB Flash
Price	$208.99 (3-pack)	$489.99 (3-pack)	$ 769.99 (2-pack)

Asus be5000 vs eero 7

Asus be5000 (bd5) is one of low end products which is comparable to eero 7. Both are budget friendly products to taste the latest generation of wifi technology (wifi7). Technically both products are the same, the same total aggregated bandwidth, the same Ethernet ports, the same quad processor, but there are couple of things different.

Larger memory

As general eero 7 comes with built-in zigbee for smart home hub, and see that the memory capacity is much larger than Asus. So what is the function of larger memory capacity for eero router? The larger memory both RAM and Flash is used to manage and control high traffic and simultaneous multiple loads and other complex algorithm for eero Truemesh technology. No wonder that eero is popular with its high performance in responsive, efficient and smooth network for connected devices including mobile devices, computers, NAS, and also your webcams. See also popular Nexigo 4k webcams vs Logitech.

Table 2 Asus be5000 vs eero 7

Wifi 7 products	Asus BD5	Eero 7
Wifi 7 segment	Dual band be5000	Dual band BE5000
Signal rates	4323Mbps @5GHz; 2×2 688Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2 4324 Mbps @5GHz 2×2
Antennas	4x Internal antennas	2.4GHz 2×2; 5GHz 2×2
Ethernet Ports	2x 2.5G WAN/LAN auto sensing	2x 2.5 Gbps
USB Ports	N/A	N/A
Dual WAN	N/A	N/A
Processor & Memory	1.5GHz Quad core processor 512 MB RAM 128MB Flash	1.1 GHz quad-core processor Memory: 1024 MB; 4 GB flash
Built-in Zigbee	N/A	Yes
Price	$208.99 (3-pack)	$349.99 (3-pack)

The price gap between the two products is quite large. Click the product’s link below to see the current price and get the best deal on Amazon.

Click here to learn more details eero 7 on Amazon (#Ad)
Or get the lower price for Asus BD5 on Amazon (#Ad)

See also Asus BD5 vs Deco XE75, best value wifi6e product vs lower end wifi 7 product.

Asus BT6 vs eero 7 pro

Now let’s see the middle range Asus products and compare it with eero 7 pro. In the middle range network segment, Asus offers few models and the comparable product to eero 7 pro is Asus BT6. You can see that the bandwidth capacity for 5GHz band is much less than eero 7 pro; while the other two bands are the same.

See also best value Deco BE63 vs Orbi 770 series; middle range products offered by TP-Link and Netgear.

Built-in Zigwee and large capacity of Flash memory are advantages for all eero products as opposed to Asus. On the other hand, Asus BT6 and other high end products support USB port for dual WAN feature for either load balance or failover scenario.

Multi-Gig Ports

Asus BT6 comes equipped with more Ethernet ports, supports up to 2.5Gbps internet speed. However, eero 7 pro comes with two 5G ports for both WAN and LAN ports.

Table 3 Asus BT6 vs eero 7 pro

Wifi 7 products	Asus BT6	Eero 7 Pro
Wifi 7 segment	Tri-band BE9400	Tri-band BE10800
Signal rates	5762Mbps @6GHz 2×2 2882Mbps @5GHz 2×2 688Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2	5765 Mbps @6GHz 2×2 4324 Mbps @5GHz 2×2 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2
Antennas	7x internal antennas	Internal antennas
Ethernet Ports	1x 2.5G WAN; 3x 1G LAN	2x 5 Gbps
USB Ports	1x USB 3.0	N/A
Dual WAN	Yes	N/A
Processor & Memory	2.0 GHz Quad core processor 1GB RAM 128 MB Flash	1.1 GHz quad-core processor Memory: 1024 MB; 4 GB flash
Built-in Zigbee	N/A	Yes
Price	$489.99 (3-pack)	$699.99 (3-pack)

You can also notice that the price gap is also quite large. So, if you don’t require 5G internet speed, and smart home hub, Asus BT6 is appropriate.

Click this link to SHOP Asus BT6 on Amazon (#Ad)

You may also like to see comparison between Asus BT10 and Deco BE85 in the middle range products. Next, the high end product offered by eero is eero max 7. This should be comparable with Asus BQ16 series.

Asus BQ16 vs eero max 7

The high end mesh products offered by Asus are BQ16 series. There two different series, the standard BQ16 which is quad band BE25000; and the Pro series is BE30000.

Asus BQ16 is comparable with eero max 7; take a look at the following table 4 below to help you get insights between the products. Technically the total aggregated bandwidth for Asus BQ16 quad-bands is larger than eero 7 max tri-band.

Multi-Gig Ports

Both BQ16 and eero max 7 come with two 10G WAN/LAN Ethernet ports. However, Asus gives you option to use both 10G ports for LAN connection only if you just need 1G Internet speed. I have no idea if in the real world you require two 10G LAN ports. One 10G for high speed NAS that comes with 10G port is reasonable. What about the other 10G LAN port, for high speed server probably for office use?

Table 4 Asus BQ16 vs eero max 7

Wifi 7 products	Asus BQ16	Eero Max 7
Wifi 7 segment	Quad-band BE25000	Tri-band BE20800
Signal rates	11529Mbps @6GHz 4×4 5764Mbps @5GHz 4×4; 5764Mbps @5GHz 4×4; 1376Mbps @2.4GHz 4×4	11,530Mbps @6GHz 4×4 8,647Mbps @5GHz 4×4 688 Mbps @2.4GHz 2×2
Antennas	12x Internal antennas with 16x high front end module	Internal antennas
Ethernet Ports	1x 10G LAN/WAN 1x 1G LAN/WAN; 1x 10G LAN 2x 1G LAN	2x 10.0Gbps 2x 2.5Gbps
USB Ports	1x USB 3.0	N/A
Dual WAN	Yes	N/A
Processor & Memory	2.6 GHz quad core processor 2GB RAM; 256 MB Flash	Quad-core A73 processor, 2GB RAM, 4GB flash storage
Built-in Zigbee	N/A	Yes
Price	$ 769.99 (2-pack)	$799.99 (2-pack)

The price difference is not too much, almost the same price.

Click here to see Asus BQ16 on Amazon (#Ad)

Summary

When you don’t require Smart home hub, Asus 7 products are more budget friendly as opposed to eero 7 products.

Best Value Asus BE3600 vs Netgear vs Archer wifi 7 routers

By admin In asus be3600, asus be3600 vs archer, asus be3600 vs netgear

Asus introduced few model of lower end wifi 7 products including Asus be3600 rt-be58u. How does this router perform compared to similar products on the market including Netgear rs100, and Archer be230?

In this article:

Asus Lower end wifi 7 products
Asus BE3600 router
RT-BE58U vs Netgear vs Archer
Asus RT-BE58U vs Netgear
Asus RT-BE58U vs Archer

Asus Lower end wifi 7 products

Like other major networking brands, Asus offers a wide range of WiFi 7 products, from entry-level to high-end models, including both mesh systems and standalone routers. Demand is especially strong in the lower-end WiFi 7 segment compared to mid-range and high-end products. It’s no surprise, then, that most vendors – such as Asus, Netgear, and TP-Link – have introduced multiple affordable WiFi 7 options.

In the entry-level mesh WiFi 7 category, Asus offers the BD4 and BD5, which compete directly with TP-Link’s Deco BE23 and BE25. But, what about standalone WiFi 7 routers?

You’ll also find comparable options like the Orbi 370 series versus the Deco BE25 in this same segment. Or you may like to see comparison between Google nest vs Deco be25.

Asus BE3600 routers

For WiFi 7 routers, Asus provides several popular entry-level BE3600 models, including the RT-BE55 and RT-BE58. These routers compete closely with similar offerings from Netgear and TP-Link. So what sets the RT-BE55 and RT-BE58 apart? Let’s take a look at the comparison table below.

Both models belong to the same WiFi 7 class, delivering up to 3,600 Mbps of total dual-band bandwidth with 2×2 MU-MIMO support. The main difference lies in their connectivity options. While both have the same number of Ethernet ports, their configurations and features differ. The RT-BE58 includes a USB port that enables dual-WAN support, whereas the RT-BE55 does not.

Asus comparison table

Table 1 below shows spec comparison table between lower end Asus be3600 wifi 7 routers. BE55 doesn’t support multi-gig 2.4G LAN port, but WAN port. On the other hand, be58u allows you to choose either utilizing 2.5Gbps port for WAN or LAN connection.

Table 1 Asus rt-be55 vs be58u

Asus	Asus RT-BE55	Asus RT-BE58U
Wifi segment	Dual band be3600 Aimesh	Dual band be3600 Aimesh
Signal rates	688Mbps @2.4GHz 2882 Mbps @5GHz	688Mbps @2.4GHz 2882 Mbps @5GHz
Antennas	4x External antennas	4x External antennas
Ethernet Ports	1x 2.5G WAN 4x 1G LAN	1x 2.5G WAN/LAN 1x 1G WAN/LAN 3x 1G LAN
USB Port	N/A	1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 4G / 5G Auto mobile tethering Samba; Media Server; FTP server
Dual WAN	N/A	Yes;
Processor	2.0GHz quad core processor 128 MB Flash 512 MB RAM	2.0GHz quad core processor 256 MB Flash 1 GB RAM
SSIDs	3x 2.4GHz 3x 5GHz	3x 2.4GHz 3x 5GHz
Price (MSRP)	$129.99	$149.99

Click the product’s link below to learn more details, see the current price and get best deals on Amazon.

Click here to SHOP Asus RT-BE58U on Amazon (#Ad)

Now let’s see how this Asus be58u perform compared to similar products offered by TP-Link and Netgear.

Asus be3600 vs Netgear vs Archer

Considering the large market share in this lower end class, each vendor tries to present products with certain advantages compared to other products while keeping prices as reasonable as possible.

In this be3600 network segment, let’s take Asus rt-be58u and compare it with Netgear RS100, and TP-Link Archer BE230. Table 2 shows you spec comparison table for Asus vs Netgear, while table 3 is for Asus vs Archer.

All the three products deliver the same aggregated bandwidth up to 3600Mbps dual band, each band support 2×2 MU-MIMO. Both Asus and Archer are designed with 4x external antennas, while Netgear come designed with 2x internal antennas with high power amplifiers.

Ethernet Ports

All the three products support multi-gig internet speed up to 2.5Gbps. With Asus BE58U, you can use either 2.5G Port or 1G port as WAN connection. So if you subscribe internet up to 1Gbps, you can use 1G port as WAN connection, while the 2.5G port as LAN port.

Netgear RS100 only comes with 2.5G port as WAN connection, while the other four Ethernet ports are 1G for LAN connection. On the other hand, TP-Link Archer BE230 is embedded with twin 2.5G Ethernet ports for WAN and LAN connection each.

In terms of Ethernet ports, Archer BE230 is more advantage than Asus be3600 and Netgear RS100.

Dual WAN port

One thing that makes Asus BE58U set apart with the other two rivals is the dual WAN support. You can connect WAN port to the cable modem such as Arris S33 or Netgear CM2000 cable modem (if you subscribe cable Internet) for primary internet connection, and you can use USB port for Dongle 4G/5G connection for secondary mobile Internet. When the primary Internet is down, the system will fail over to the secondary internet in ‘Fail over scenario’. You can also use the load balance scenario with two internet source.

Netgear RS100 and Archer BE230 don’t support dual WAN. Netgear RS100 doesn’t come with USB port, but Archer does. However, Archer be230 with USB port doesn’t support 4G/5G dongle.

See also GL-Inet Flint 3 and Asus BE92U , middle range wifi7 routers that support dual WAN either ‘failover’ or load balance’.

Comparison table Asus vs Netgear

Table 2 Asus be3600 vs Netgear

Asus	Asus RT-BE58U	Netgear RS100
Wifi segment	Dual band be3600 Aimesh	Dual band BE3600
Signal rates	688Mbps @2.4GHz 2882 Mbps @5GHz	688Mbps @2.4GHz 2882 Mbps @5GHz
Antennas	4x External antennas	2x high-performance internal antennas and high-power amplifiers
Ethernet Ports	1x 2.5G WAN/LAN 1x 1G WAN/LAN 3x 1G LAN	1x 2.5 Gbps internet port 4x 10/100/1000 Mbps Gigabit Ethernet LAN ports
USB Port	1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 4G / 5G Auto mobile tethering Samba; Media Server; FTP server	N/A
Dual WAN	Yes;	N/A
Processor	2.0GHz quad core processor 256 MB Flash 1 GB RAM	Powerful quad-core 2.0 GHz processor
SSIDs	3x 2.4GHz 3x 5GHz	1x SSID each band
Price (MSRP)	$149.99	$149.99

There is no price gap between Asus be3600 and Netgear RS100 (MSRP). However, prices are always dropped over time. Click the link below to see the current price and get best deal on Amazon.

Click here to SHOP Netgear RS100 on Amazon (#Ad)

Comparison table Asus vs Archer

Table 3 below is spec comparison table for Asus and Archer in this low end category. Both introduce competing features. If you require multi-Gig internet speed up to 2Gbps, and high speed multi-gig 2.5Gbps LAN connection such as to high speed NAS, TP-Link Archer BE3600 offers better value. However, if you require internet speed under 1Gbps and dual WAN support, Asus BE58u is more advantages.

Table 3 Asus BE3600 vs Archer

Asus	Asus RT-BE58U	TP-Link Archer BE230
Wifi segment	Dual band be3600 Aimesh	Dual band be3600 Easy-Mesh compatible routers / Extender
Signal rates	688Mbps @2.4GHz 2882 Mbps @5GHz	688Mbps @2.4GHz 2882 Mbps @5GHz
Antennas	4x External antennas	4x External antennas
Ethernet Ports	1x 2.5G WAN/LAN 1x 1G WAN/LAN 3x 1G LAN	1x 2.5G WAN 1x 2.5G LAN 3x 1G LAN
USB Port	1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 4G / 5G Auto mobile tethering Samba; Media Server; FTP server	1x USB 3.0 FTP Server; Media Server; Samba Server
Dual WAN	Yes;	N/A
Processor	2.0GHz quad core processor 256 MB Flash 1 GB RAM	Quad core processor, no detail
SSIDs	3x 2.4GHz 3x 5GHz	1x 2.4GHx 1x 5GHz
Price (MSRP)	$149.99	$119.99

The price gap between the two products is not too large. Click the product’s link t to see current price and get best deal on Amazon.

Click here to SHOP Archer BE230 on Amazon (#Ad)

Related products

For middle range wifi7 routers, you may like to see Asus RT-BE96U vs Archer vs Netgear. A comparison between the recent wifi7 router and previous wifi 6e product, see which one is better value.

For small home, see this legacy Asus XP4 powerline mesh wifi6, a mesh wifi 6 product with powerline backhaul using electrical wiring in place.

Maecenas sollicitudin

California, United States.

Author title

Author Archive by admin

What this product does

Tenda Vs Deco Vs Cudy

Tenda BE3600 vs Deco

Processor

Interfaces

Comparison table Tenda vs Deco

Comparison table Tenda vs Cudy

Why Cudy?

Entry level Cudy

Cudy M3600 vs Deco BE23

Internet support

Faster processor

Cudy M3600 vs Asus

What this emeet s600 does

S600 Highlights

eMeet S600 vs Nexigo vs Logitech

eMeet S600 vs Nexigo N970p

Lens

Resolution and frame rate

Digital zoom

eMeet S600 vs Logitech Brio

Asus vs TP-Link Gaming routers

TP-Link middle range gaming router

Comparison Archer GE650 vs AX1100

Asus ROG BE12000 vs ROG AX11000

Asus Vs Archer Wifi 7 gaming routers

Ethernet Ports

USB Port

Game feature

Related products

Arris cable modem router combo

Products Comparison

Arris vs Netgear

Port interfaces

Comparison table

All-in-one or separate devices

Related products

Orbi mesh wifi 7 vs eero

Eero7 series

Eero 7 Lineup Series

Eero 7 comparison

Available 6GHz adapters

Orbi comparable products

Entry level Orbi vs eero 7

Built-in Zigbee

Middle range Orbi vs eero

Port interfaces

Orbi 870 vs eero max 7

Ethernet Ports

Asus AX3000 Routers

Asus RT-AX58U vs GS-AX3000

Aimesh

TP-Link AX3000

TP-Link AX3000 or Archer BE3600

Port Interfaces

Asus ax3000 vs TP-Link

Asus BE3600 vs Archer

Ethernet Ports

Dual WAN

TP-Link Deco AX3000

Deco x60 vs Deco x55

Ethernet Ports

Deco Comparison table

Deco x60 vs BE23

Faster capacity

Deco X60 vs Orbi Rbk750

Ethernet Ports

Internet speed

Related products

Asus vs eero mesh wifi 7

Asus vs eero 7 comparable products

Asus Comparison table

Asus be5000 vs eero 7

Larger memory

Asus BT6 vs eero 7 pro

Multi-Gig Ports